Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'linux'.
Found 3 results
I recently set up key based ssh authentication for my workstation to a test server (running Centos 6) I have. The key based authentication works fine and I am able to log in just by entering a passphrase. In a quest to allow login without entering anything at all (except for the first time in a given server reboot session), I downloaded and configured keychain on my server. In this case it's on the root user but I plan on using it for other users and disabling root login completely (server is on a private network anyhow). To my understanding, keychain allows you to access the server without entering a passphrase except the first time logging in between server reboots. I am showing that after first using keychain, it prompted me for a passphrase then keychain itself prompted me for a passphrase then it logged me in. On my second login (illustrated below), it still continues to ask me for my passphrase. Second login: login as: root Authenticating with public key "imported-openssh-key" Passphrase for key "imported-openssh-key": Last login: Wed Apr 8 17:35:54 2020 from 18.104.22.168 * keychain 2.8.0 ~ http://www.funtoo.org * Found existing ssh-agent: 4023 * Known ssh key: /root/.ssh/id_rsa root@server1 [~]# If there a way to get this to not ask me for my passphrase or did I misconfigure anything? I haven't changed anything in the sshd_config so far. Here's my .bash_profile and location of the key files: root@server1 [~]# cat .bash_profile # .bash_profile # Get the aliases and functions if [ -f ~/.bashrc ]; then . ~/.bashrc fi # User specific environment and startup programs PATH=$PATH:$HOME/bin export PATH eval `keychain --agents ssh --eval id_rsa` root@server1 [~]# find | grep id_rsa ./.ssh/id_rsa.pub ./.ssh/id_rsa root@server1 [~]# I feel like i've tried everything at this point. Please let me know if i need to provide some more details. Thanks for the help!
Hi folks O/ few years ago I wonder about a friendly version of Gentoo and Funtoo, the gentoo community don't liked, but I keep did some tests but I didn't continue, well, few week ago I start again, but this time only a Funtoo Friendly version, and now I have something really beginning. the project will resume in few flavors and one version with a overlay with update packages and few extra. the funtoo flavors are X+openbox, gnome and Plasma, they are just the Funtoo Stage3 Generic with few packages and some configuration. and has one version with plasma, but with an overlay with few update packages and other stuffs, a stage more out of the box, I want make something to people learn about gentoo/funtoo or for who use the system without spent hours to build the system. the webiste will be done in the next weeks, and the stages will be available in the next days "sorry, I'm with one pc now, and the net is a turtle". website -> https://bentoo.info/ binhost -> http://binhost.bentoo.info github repos : overlay -> https://github.com/lucascouts/bentoo configurations -> https://github.com/lucascouts/bentoo-cfg I don't know if the funtoo community will like but anyway I'll forward with this project, but will be great if few users could help with feedback or criticisms. thank you anyway ?
OK, I have my kernel in @system, not in @world, and my kernel sources don't support 3.17 yet because its ck-sources, nor do I want to upgrade my kernel. I'm tired of compiling and tired of stuff being broken. WHY is it trying to install kernel-headers 3.17-r1? My kernel is 3.13, so this sounds like a really BAD idea. Shouldn't portage be smart enough not to do this? Maybe funtoo was a bad idea. Weeks now and still not finished installing! This shouldn't be this difficult. I only did a sync because it was supposed to fix gedit's vapigen thing, and its still broken just giving me different error (see other thread), php is still not building due to sandbox violations, and now I have a new problem I didn't have before. Next step is a hammer! Anyone know how to fix this??