Jump to content

zogg

Members
  • Content Count

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About zogg

  • Rank
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

500 profile views
  1. Hi, same as steam requires 32bit, wine requires 32bit for some application(or games in that matter, e.g. Battle.Net) So I created docker (basically same way steam one if made) and it seems to work. It would require wrapper to launch it and proper ebuild. I'm not sure if I'm going to continue working on it, but if anyone want to take over or play starcraft 2 😛 https://github.com/funkycode/funtoo-wine-launcher - dockerfile https://quay.io/repository/funkycode/funtoo-wine-launcher - docker image to launch: # Make folder for steam data STEAM_DATA_FOLDER=~/
  2. I don't mind anyone checking my overlay or using it, but I'm not sure I want to maintain and take responsibility for that one, as I'm not sure I would keep using deepin or funtoo (already moved work laptop back to gentoo) P.S. I also update to latest LTS nvidia kernel modules (440.82) as I'm using 5.6 kernel from gentoo 😄
  3. I was able to adjust Gentoo overlay and using it as DE right now :) I have overlay, but I added some flags and packages manually and it might require some instructions
  4. If you need to report most of the things — it is kinda doing it yourself. It is fair to tell that it's homebrew distro and noone owns you anything. But if you advertise your distro asstable and that it can be used in production, regardless of it being free or not — you need to provide certain standards. There is a problem of small group of maintainers in Funtoo and it's logical that it would not have all fixes and there would still be problems. The question is the % of the user input vs maintainers work. If there is need for all users to always report - it's not everyday stable
  5. I am not sure where and what builds were, but I trust 1.3 branch git commits history. And do not blame me of missing links to any bug report, as you obviously missed whole point of my post and cherry picking exactly things you want to answer to, while sticking to golang. I did contribute to Funtoo when I could (yes it was long time ago, when Funtoo just started and Martin and other guys was in core team), but currently I have less time and opportunity to do it. I did not report as I did not check what vulnerabilities golang or kubectl (somehow you did not comment on that one) h
  6. wrote previous reply before read yours :) in general I do agree with you, but I do not compare with Gentoo, I suggest to co-exist as with any other useful resources that can be used, that's it.
  7. It was updated yesterday (I assume because of the post) to 1.12.x :D Before as I see from Januar 03 we had 1.11.4 which has vulnerability in link below, vulnerability was published at 24th of January, which gives us Feb, March + almost April till yesterday. https://www.cvedetails.com/vulnerability-list/vendor_id-14185/product_id-29205/version_id-280874/Golang-GO-1.11.4.html Though my point is not specific software, but that switching release model doesn't make automatically everything perfect and stable (secure is stable in my opinion at 2019). I think that Funtoo has
  8. The latest update 5 months ago and latest version 1.13.2 — https://github.com/funtoo/nokit/tree/6f2923d531ffd96789bec3cebdb0249ec27bfe77/sys-cluster/kubectl As an example CVE that effects this version — https://www.cvedetails.com/cve/CVE-2019-1002101/ I assume if you want to search you can find more :D
  9. From my understanding anyone that is so concerned about stability should not use current masks and use stable ones instead. Telling that waiting for release for 6 months in case you need to fix something on your system (don't tell me that if it says stable it will be 100% perfect and bug free, especially if it's done by 1.5 person). As an example I have some 32 bit software I can't use with 1.3 release as no proper workaround is ready now, so it forces me to have chroot with new system I need to maintain as well for this 32bit software or being stuck on 1.2 which is broken (Oleg word
  10. You are correct regarding contribution. Though my point was not about missing packages, but in general in the idea of switching to rolling release. It's obviously that after all @drobbins is doing amazing job, it's just the current idea of future updates does not suit me or/and some others. For me rolling release is the reason I was on Gentoo and after that Funtoo for about 15 years and it is natural that such change is something that would make me consider if this is the way I want to go. And I did contribution to Funtoo , small but still... As today I have less timne and oppor
  11. To be fair enuf, it seems little bit confusing "new technologies" and slow updates. In order to maintain own packages (hello also dependencies of those packages) by yourself + few pull requests from other people vs gentoo community - it would be funny to maintain yourself whole distro (are we LFS now?). Or to bump you for each build and wait for your response. (after all we'll get messy yaourt as in arch with lists of half dead overlays with duplicated and conflicting packages - yay stability \o/ ) It's pity that new distro technology comes as price for new packages and up-to-date softwa
  12. I am with you. It's pity that even Ubuntu gets newer packages than funtoo :(
  13. Aren't you describing the whole idea of stable, masked and hard masked? or as in funtoo was stable, current and experimental? I think it was a reason I used gentoo and now funtoo. Current was stable enuf or you could always mask yourself the package till update with fix will come out. On other hand you could just easily unmask still not stable package and if needed resolve dependencies, flag updates and etc if needed. Otherwise if the point of snapshots to give stability, what's the point of being source based at all? :)
  14. Just happened to me on 1.3 o.O Moved /var/git/meta-repo and synced from scratch to resolve the issue
×
×
  • Create New...