Jump to content
Read the Funtoo Newsletter: Summer 2023 ×

dartomic

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    5

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by dartomic

  4. What is a good IDE or source code editor?

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    On 12/12/2021 at 1:19 PM, gatolinux said:

    On 2021, I used these editors:

    • vim
    • gedit
    • notepad++
    • atom
    • VS Studio Code
    • kate

    I like notepad ++ because in case of catastrophic failure, it does remember the contents of all files I was working on, even the changes I haven't saved yet.

    I had been using atom for several months, and I still like it so much.

    I used VS Studio Code for a while, but I am not still convinced of it.

    Right now, I am using kate and I feel it matches all my needs (except the great memory feature of notepad++, unfortunately) and I bet I will stick to it for a long while. I customized the default options and made it atom-like, but I feel I'm distilled open source and that makes me happy. Also, I love the icon set and the minimap. I abandoned atom because I didn't like the available mindmap addons.

     

    VS Studio Code does that as well, I think. I haven't used it in a while. But I do like it a lot. I like Kate a lot too. Vim seems cool, I just don't know how to use all of it's features yet.

  5. What is a good IDE or source code editor?

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    On 12/13/2021 at 5:07 PM, drobbins said:

    I use pycharm professional (paid) because I do a lot of python. The JetBrains editors are pretty good and a 'sweet spot' in terms of functionality and usability. The python-code-related features really are helpful.

    I don't know Python, but I see a lot of job postings for it. I really like C, but I haven't seen many jobs for C programmers unless I learn more math and assembly to work for a video game company. But I have seen a lot of people say good things about PyCharm. I'll have to get into that when I get into writing more advanced stuff in Python later.

    Is it safe to assume that anything below Python 3 is pointless to learn, if they're different? I'm not really sure if they're different languages.

  6. Need help updating the system

    in General Help

    Posted · Edited by dartomic

    Update: Nevermind, I figured it out.

     

    I haven't done an emerge for a while, and decided to do one now that I'm thinking about it. I don't remember my way around how to solve this, and I have to get back to my studies soon.

    Anyway; I typed sudo emerge -auVDN @world into the console. It completed a lot of it, but stops here:

      

    >>> Failed to emerge app-editors/nano-6.0, Log file:

>>>  '/var/tmp/portage/app-editors/nano-6.0/temp/build.log'


    Here is the log file:
      

    >>> Downloading 'https://fastpull-us.funtoo.org/distfiles/nano-6.0.tar.gz'
--2022-01-24 03:22:26--  https://fastpull-us.funtoo.org/distfiles/nano-6.0.tar.gz
Resolving fastpull-us.funtoo.org... 192.150.253.88
Connecting to fastpull-us.funtoo.org|192.150.253.88|:443... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found
2022-01-24 03:22:27 ERROR 404: Not Found.

>>> Downloading 'https://www.nano-editor.org/dist/latest/nano-6.0.tar.gz'
--2022-01-24 03:22:27--  https://www.nano-editor.org/dist/latest/nano-6.0.tar.gz
Resolving www.nano-editor.org... 213.138.109.86
Connecting to www.nano-editor.org|213.138.109.86|:443... failed: Connection refused.
!!! Couldn't download 'nano-6.0.tar.gz'. Aborting.
^[[31;01m * ^[[39;49;00mFetch failed for 'app-editors/nano-6.0', Log file:
^[[31;01m * ^[[39;49;00m '/var/tmp/portage/app-editors/nano-6.0/temp/build.log'

    I see that it was not able to download it from the location that it attempts to get it from.

    I personally don't care about having nano, because I have vim. So I uninstalled it hoping that it might just skip trying to get nano. But obviously that made no difference.

    So any help would be great. Thanks!

  7. What is a good IDE or source code editor?

    in General Discussion

    Posted

    I was using VS Code for a while, but I just tried Kate and realized that I like it a lot better. I want to know what else people like a lot, even if it's for the terminal, and even if it requires a lot of learning. If it does require a lot of learning, I would like to know what features might make it worth the effort to learn the application.

  9. stage 3 key is not certified with a trusted signature

    in Installation Help

    Posted · Edited by dartomic
    1st time: To maybe narrow down what my problem may be, if there is a problem. | 2nd time: spelling correction.

    Edit: I should probably first say that I don't know much about what I am looking at here. I will learn more about that later once I start studying  my cyber security books. I really just want to know if the output that I am getting is ok for me to continue with the installation process. I would hate to install some system that some jerk modified for some malicious reason.

    I am wanting to install the recommended gnome stage 3. The instructions say that I should see output similar to this: 

    gpg: Signature made Sun 25 Dec 2016 03:57:27 PM MST using RSA key ID 613539CB
gpg: checking the trustdb
gpg: 3 marginal(s) needed, 1 complete(s) needed, PGP trust model
gpg: depth: 0  valid:   1  signed:   4  trust: 0-, 0q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 1u
gpg: depth: 1  valid:   4  signed:   0  trust: 3-, 1q, 0n, 0m, 0f, 0u
gpg: Good signature from "Daniel Robbins (metro:odroid-xu4) <drobbins@funtoo.org>" [full]


    But instead, I am receiving this output: 

    gpg: Signature made Wed Nov 24 19:33:44 2021 UTC
gpg:                using RSA key 30737D12308C9D0C882FC34B57CB0A121BAECB2E
gpg: Good signature from "Daniel Robbins (metro:node) <drobbins@funtoo.org>" [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 70AC BB6B FEE7 BC57 2A89  41D1 9266 C4FA 11FD 00FD
 Subkey fingerprint: 3073 7D12 308C 9D0C 882F  C34B 57CB 0A12 1BAE CB2E


    I made sure to do the best I could at following the instructions for trusting last 8 digits of the BDFL fingerprint, and using gpg --recv-key command for the last 8 digits of the build server's primary key fingerprint. But then when I follow the next instruction: "gpg --verify stage3-latest.tar.xz.gpg stage3-latest.tar.xz" the above output is what I get. I use the actual file names, not a copy and paste of the text "stage3-latest.tar.xz.gpg stage3-latest.tar.xz" from the instruction.

    I installed the Cinnamon desktop the other day, and I don't remember having this issue, if it is an issue. If it's not an issue, then I will just continue with the install process. If it is an issue, then this is the skylake stage 3 package for gnome.

×
×
  • Create New...