yczo

#eix dev-libs/openssl [U] dev-libs/openssl Verf?gbare Versionen: (0.9.8) 0.9.8z_p8^d (0) 1.0.2k^d {M}(~)1.1.0e(0/1.1)^d {+asm bindist gmp kerberos rfc3779 sctp sslv2 +sslv3 static-libs test (+)tls-heartbeat vanilla zlib ABI_MIPS="n32 n64 o32" ABI_PPC="32 64" ABI_S390="32 64" ABI_X86="32 64 x32" CPU_FLAGS_X86="sse2"} Installierte Versionen: 1.0.2k^d(21:27:41 10.08.2017)(asm sslv3 tls-heartbeat zlib -bindist -gmp -kerberos -rfc3779 -sctp -sslv2 -static-libs -test -vanilla ABI_MIPS="-n32 -n64 -o32" ABI_PPC="-32 -64" ABI_S390="-32 -64" ABI_X86="64 -32 -x32" CPU_FLAGS_X86="sse2") Startseite: http://www.openssl.org/ Beschreibung: full-strength general purpose cryptography library (including SSL and TLS)

Thank you very much for answer; Yes, in my system is too like unstable marked The questios is: Why try to install it???? where should look to fix it? Regards

Hello, I am on current und new instalation, I tried to mask =dev-libs/openssl-1.1.0e because produce a failure rebuilding python 2.7, but, don't work. I tried to create the file /etc/portage/package.mask... and there added the line "=dev-libs/openssl-1.1.0e". Did not work... later I did make tje next simbolyc link "package.mask -> /var/git/meta-repo/kits/core-kit/profiles/base/package.mask" and added the same line; Had not working too. when i make emerge --update --deep --newuse world... the dev-libs/openssl-1.1.0e install again un produce the error rebuilding python 2.7 Why is not masked?? What Can i do for mask the ebuild? Is anything wrong? Thanks in advance. Greetings

Hello world, (pardon me for my poor English) I am new in Funtoo, I come from gentoo. I have a Brother-DCP 81100DN, that usually used with multilib in gentoo. This time tried to use AMD64 pure, but i find no way to right configure, except for the test page. Naturally Cups detect the printer. According to an arch guide, running brcupsconfig4 into /opt/brother/Printers/DCP8110DN/cupswrapper folder, configure the printer... but is not possible, that is the output # ls -l total 40 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 19618 Jan 11 2012 brcupsconfig4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12150 Jan 11 2012 brother-DCP-8110DN-cups-en.ppd -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5108 Jan 11 2012 brother_lpdwrapper_DCP8110DN # chmod +x brcupsconfig4 # ./brcupsconfig4 bash: ./brcupsconfig4: No such file or directory Summary: * Printer detectet from cups * Testpage, sometimes print *Programs like Kate or Libreoffice when seen the printer, dont print *Config programs, foreign code don't run I suppose that forget some compatibility option with foreign code in kernel , should the 32 bit code posibility discard? because # cat .config |grep IA32 CONFIG_IA32_EMULATION=y .CONFIG_IA32_AOUT=y Here is the complete .config https://pastebin.com/ExAECpmf and my make.conf https://pastebin.com/QHVZ0hic Please, any help will be grateful Thanks in advance

Hi comunity, (please pardon for my English) Im trying to configure a new custom kernel, but it does not work. When the Kernel starts, the root partition is like read only mounted. On the other hand /boot (Efi) and /home are not mounted Please, someone so kind to help me? Thanks in advance (Please ignore the systemd line. I have disabled it and I have the same problem) here is the config for my kernel v4.9.6 https://pastebin.com/UC9GeZjT my dmesg output https://pastebin.com/gTgdGUYV my fstab file #/dev/sda1------------------------------------------------------------------------> UUID=A841-5975 /boot vfat auto,noatime 1 2 #/dev/sda7-------------------------------------------------------------------------> UUID=70ef3567-5816-41fa-9647-b4e9ef8f05a4 /home xfs noatime,nodiratime 0 1 #/dev/sda9-------------------------------------------------------------------------> UUID=a6943e82-8de6-45f8-9b26-1779f0a37b8e / xfs noatime,nodiratime 0 2 my /etc/default/grub config GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="root=UUID=a6943e82-8de6-45f8-9b26-1779f0a37b8e rootfstype=xfs" my kernel Built in chain [*] Built-in kernel command line ? ? ? ? (root=UUID=a6943e82-8de6-45f8-9b26-1779f0a37b8e rootfstype=xfs) Built-in kernel command string ? ? ? ? [*] Built-in command line overrides boot loader arguments Regards